Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25329 (CHH)

SUKH BAI v. RAJENDRA KHARE

WP227/403/2022 · 2025-06-18

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:25611 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 403 of 2022 1 - Sukh Bai W/o Late Bishnath Ratnakar Aged About 60 Years R/o Village Kutrabod, Police Station And Tahsil Pamgarh, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh 2 - Jai Prakash Ratnakar S/o Late Bishnath Ratnakar Aged About 41 Years R/o Village Kutrabod, Police Station And Tahsil Pamgarh, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh 3 - Om Prakash Ratnakar S/o Late Bishnath Ratnakar Aged About 37 Years R/o Village Kutrabod, Police Station And Tahsil Pamgarh, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh 4 - Laxmi Bai Ratnakar D/o Late Bishnath Ratnakar Aged About 36 Years R/o Village Kutrabod, Police Station And Tahsil Pamgarh, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Rajendra Khare S/o Panch Ram Khare Aged About 54 Years Caste Suryavanshi, By Caste Satnami R/o Village Malvashi (Lagra), Tahsil Pamgarh At Present R/o Basant Vihar Colony, S. E. C. L., A/ 366, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 2 - Devid Kumar Khare S/o Rajendra Khare Aged About 28 Years By Caste Satnami R/o Village Malvashi (Lagra), Tahsil Pamgarh At Present R/o Basant Vihar Colony, S. E. C. L., A/ 366, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 3 - Namita Khare D/o Rajendra Khare Aged About 30 Years By Caste Satnami R/o Village Malvashi (Lagra), Tahsil Pamgarh At Present R/o Basant Vihar Colony, S. E. C. L., A/ 366, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh Digitally signed by AJINKYA PANSARE Date: 2025.06.19 14:09:42 +0530 2 4 - Kalpana Khare D/o Rajendra Khare Aged About 26 Years By Caste Satnami R/o Village Malvashi (Lagra), Tahsil Pamgarh At Present R/o Basant Vihar Colony, S. E. C. L., A/ 366, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 5 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Collector, Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioners : Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate on behalf of Mr. P.K. Patel, Advocate For State : Mr. Sanjeev Agrawal, P.L. Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Judgment On Board 19-06-2025 1) Learned counsel for the petitioners fairly submits that by efflux of time, this petition has become infructuous. 2) Recording the submission made hereinabove, instant writ petition stands dismissed being rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE Ajinkya