Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25329 (CAL)

SUKUMAR NASKAR v. MAHESHTALA MUNICIPALITY AND ORS

WPA/11557/2025 · 2025-05-23

Gaurang Kanth

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

23.05.2025 Sl. No.11 akd W. P. A. 11557 of 2025 [Sukumar Naskar -Vs- Maheshtala Municipality & Ors.] Mr. Pankaj Mukherjee Mr. Indrajit Bhattacharjee … … for the petitioner Mr. Raghunath Chakraborty … … for the Municipality [Maheshtala Municipality] 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that his client does not wish to proceed with the instant writ petition. Written instruction of the petitioner to his learned Advocate-on-record is placed on record. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. 3. Let urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties on usual undertaking. (Gaurang Kanth, J.)