Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25327 (ALL)

RAMA SHANKER RAM AND ANOTHER v. BOARD OF REVENUE AND OTHERS

WRIB/31303/2004 · 2025-08-04

J J Munir

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:131967 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD Court No. - 49 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 31303 of 2004 Petitioner :- Rama Shanker Ram and another Respondent :- Board of Revenue, U.P. at Allahabad and others Counsel for Petitioner :- Jai Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,H.M.B.Sinha Hon'ble J.J. Munir,J. 1. This matter was mentioned in the post lunch hours, saying that on account of proceedings on remand being decided, this petition has become infructuous. 2. In the interest of not retaining causes on file, that are no longer alive, this matter is taken up forthwith. 3. By an order dated 11.05.2004 arising out of proceedings under Section 122-B (4-F) of the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, the Board of Revenue, U.P. at Allahabad has set aside the order dated 08.01.2002 passed by the Commissioner of the Division and remanded the matter to the Commissioner for decision afresh, bearing in mind the remarks in the order. This order of remand was challenged before this Court by the present writ petition. 4. In the meantime, pursuant to the order of remand, the Commissioner has decided the matter vide order dated 05.04.2014, dismissing the revision. 5. Mr. Hari Manish Bahadur Sinha, learned Counsel for the respondent Nos. 4 and 5, says that the order of the Additional Commissioner dated 05.04.2014 has not been put to further challenge. 6. Be that as it may, so far as the present matter is concerned, this writ petition, being one against a remand order, where, after remand, proceedings in the Court below have been decided, is rendered infructuous. 7. Mr. Jai Singh, learned Counsel for the petitioners, is present. He has no instructions today. Apparently, this writ petition has become infructuous. It is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous. 8. It is, however, clarified that if there is any other step taken by parties, which keeps the cause alive, it shall be open to the respondents to seek revival of this writ petition. Order Date :- 5.8.2025 I. Batabyal (J.J. Munir, J.) Whether the order is speaking : Yes Whether the order is reportable : No Digitally signed by :- ISHAN BATABYAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad