Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25326 (RAJ)

BRAJESH KUMAR SHARMA v. STATE URBAN DEVELOPMENTORS

CW/6999/2015 · 2025-01-21

Mahendar Kumar Goyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:2871] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6999/2015 Brajesh Kumar Sharma Son Of Shri Vishwambhar Dayal Sharma, aged about 52 years, resident of 77/162-A, Arawali Marg, Shipra Path, Mansarovar, Jaipur ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Urban Development And Housing, Jaipur 2. Rajasthan Housing Board, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur, Through Its Commissioner 3. Estate Manager, Circle-I, Rajasthan Housing Board, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashok Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ajay Shukla HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Judgment / Order 21/01/2025 This writ petition is directed against the letter dated 31.07.2013 issued by the respondent No.2 whereby, a request of the petitioner for revival of the allotment has been rejected. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to his application for revival of the allotment, he was called upon by the respondents vide letter dated 20.05.2013 to appear within a week alongwith all original documents pertaining to registration and an identity card with photo still, vide letter impugned dated 31.07.2013, his request has been rejected. Indisputably, vide letter dated 20.05.2013, the petitioner was required to attend the office within a period of seven days [2025:RJ-JP:2871] (2 of 2) [CW-6999/2015] alongwith original documents of registration and an identity card with photo; however, despite repeated requests of this Court, learned counsel for the petitioner is neither ready to make a statement that pursuant to this letter, he attended the office of the Rajasthan Housing Board alongwith the requisite documents nor, he is ready to demonstrate the averments in the writ petition to this effect in absence whereof, this Court finds no illegality in the letter impugned dated 31.07.2013. Therefore, this civil writ petition is dismissed being devoid of merit. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J Manish/58