APHC010358302023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3506] THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION NO: 18876/2023 Between: 1. CHUKKA VIJESH KUMAR, S/O SAMABASIVA RAO, R/O D.NO-2-59/1, ALURU VILLAGE, PONNUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE UNION OF INDIA, THROUGH THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, GOVT. OF INDIA, SOUTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI. 2. THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTORATE GENERAL, DISCIPLINE AND VIGILANCE DV- 4 (A), ADJUTANT GENERAL'S BRANCH, I NTEGRATED HEADQUARTERS, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE (ARMY), DHQPO, NEW DELHI- 110105. 3. GENERAL OFFICER COMMANDINGINCHIEF, EASTERN COMMAND, PIN-910254 , C/O 99 APO. 4. THE COLONEL, COLONEL GENERAL STAFF (HUMAN RIGHTS), FOR GENERAL OFFICER COMMANDING-IN- CHIEF, EASTERN COMMAND, PIN-910254 , C/O 99 APO. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CHIRAL RURAL POLICE STATION, CHIRALA, PRAKASAM DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ one in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ for quashing of the impugned show cause notice No.201630/315/Al(HR-3M), Dt.03.06.2023. issued by 3rd and 4th Respondents directing the petitioner to show cause as to why maintenance allowance to wife and son not to be deducted from the salary of the petitioner. Further directing the Respondents more particularly 3rd and 4th Respondents not to interfere in the civil disputes of the petitioner and declaring the action of the 3rd and 4th Respondents as incompetent, non-est, illegal, arbitrary and in violation of law. and be pleased to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KHAJA KHUTUBUDDIN SHAIK Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. JUPUDI V K YAGNADUTT(CENTRAL GOVERNMENT COUNSEL) 2. . The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN Writ Petition No.18876 of 2023 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending consideration, if any, in this case shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN Date:10.07.2025. cs