KHOSHENDER LAL AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER
CWP/14696/2025 · 2025-09-11
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25317 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25317 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.14696 of 2025 alongwith
connected matters
Decided on: 11th September, 2025 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. CWP No.14696 of 2025 Khoshender Lal and others
…..Petitioners
Versus
State of H.P. and another
.....Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. CWP No.14698 of 2025 Kiran Kumari and others
…..Petitioners
Versus
State of H.P. and another
.....Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. CWP No.14700 of 2025 Kashmir Chand and another
…..Petitioners
Versus
State of H.P. and another
.....Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. CWP No.14720 of 2025 Kamal Dev
…..Petitioner
Versus
State of H.P. and another
.....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1
1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.
2 For the Petitioners: Mr. Vishal Singh Thakur, Advocate vice
Mr. Arun Kaushal, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Rajat Choudhry, Assistant Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Petitioners are stated to have preferred representations to the respondents in August, 2024 seeking applicability of a decision that was rendered on 29.11.2024.
2.
On being confronted, learned vice counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that there are some inadvertent errors in the writ petitions and also the documents appended therewith. He, therefore, seeks permission to withdraw the writ petitions with liberty to file afresh in accordance with law.
Granting such permission, the present writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua September 11, 2025
Judge Mukesh