[2025:RJ-JP:30599] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9327/2025 Hansram Mina S/o Baldeshwar, R/o Bada Gaav, Police Station Sirmathura, District Dholpur (Rajasthan) Presently Confined In District Jail, Dholpur. ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dheeraj Singhal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 07/08/2025 1 This instant application for bail filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. by the applicant-accused Hansram Mina S/o Baldeshwar in FIR No. 310/2024 dated 01.12.2024 registered at P.S. Sarmathpura, District -Dholpur, whereby the applicant-accused has charged under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 351(2), 303(2), 333, 125, 324(4), 324(5) of BNS. 2 The applicant was arrested and has in judicial custody since 09.07.2025. The Court below has dismissed the bail application. 3 Learned counsel for the applicant relying upon grounds raised in bail application submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that neither from intention nor from injury it was proved that [2025:RJ-JP:30599] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-9327/2025] the intention was to commit homicide of injured. He further submits that only one ulna bone fracture was caused and same was noticed by the Trial Court. He further submits that except present case there is one more case is registered against the applicant. Further, he also submits that the investigation relating to present applicant-accused is complete and is no more required by the Investigating Agency for investigation. He further assures that in case, the applicant-accused is required for further investigation, the applicants-accused will be available for such investigation. He also submitted that the investigation will take its own time and no purpose will be served by keeping the applicants-accused in custody. At last, he submits that intention of appellant-accused is not proved from the evidence recorded by police and no injury was caused to any of the vital part of the injured. 4 Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned Public Prosecutor. 5 Heard learned counsel for the applicant-accused, learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for complainant. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties. 6 The injury report referred by learned counsel indicate that Shyam Sunder has sustained one grievous injury on lower ulna bone whereas other injuries are simple in nature. There is no other criminal case reported against the appellant- accused. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the [2025:RJ-JP:30599] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-9327/2025] case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicant-accused 7 Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicants-accused Hansram Mina S/o Baldeshwar, is hereby allowed and ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The applicant-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The applicant-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicant-accused shall be liable to be canceled. 8 The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN ),J MONU /267