- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:1754 WP No. 1893 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 1893 OF 2021 (GM-KSR) BETWEEN: 1. THE TUMKUR NAGARA VEERASHAIVA SAMAJA SEVA SAMITHI, (SOCIETY REGISTERED UNDER THE MYSORE SOCIETIES REGISTRATION ACT 1960), J.C.ROAD, TUMKUR-572 101. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. SR. A.R. RENUKANAND. S/O SRI A.R. RENUKA PRASAD AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS. 2. SRI. T.B. SHEKAR S/O LATE BASAVARAJU.T.S., AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, PRESIDENT, THE TUMKUR NAGARA VEERASHAIVA SAMAJA SEVA SAMITHI (SOCIETY REGISTERED UNDER THE MYSORE SOCIETIES REGISTRATION ACT 1960), J.C. ROAD, TUMKUR-572 101. 3. SRI K.G.SHIVAKUMAR S/O LATE GANGADHARAIAH, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, MEMBER AND ELECTED BOARD MEMBER OF THE TUMKUR NAGARA, VEERASHAIVA SAMAJA SEVA SAMITHI (SOCIETY REGISTERED UNDER THE MYSORE SOCIETIES REGISTRATION ACT 1960). J.C. ROAD, TUMKUR-572 101. Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:1754 WP No. 1893 of 2021 4. SRI A.R. RENUKANAND S/O SRI A.R.RENUKA PRASAD, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/A NO. 1047, ARALPET MAIN ROAD, TUMKUR-572 101. 5. SRI. T.B.SHEKAR S/O LATE BASAVARJU T.S. AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/A NO.151, "NAKSHA NILAYA" TUDA LAYOUT, A.M.PALYA MAIN ROAD, SIRA GATE, TUMAKURU-572 101. …PETITIONERS (BY SMT. SHARADA.N., ADVOCATE) AND: THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR OF SOCIETIES AND THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, 2ND FLOOR, MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA, TUMKIUR-572 101. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR., AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Smt.Sharada.N., counsel for the petitioners and Sri.Mahantesh Shettar., AGA for the respondent have appeared in person. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:1754 WP No. 1893 of 2021 2. The captioned Writ Petition is filed seeking following reliefs: a. A Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to take the revised audit report of the petitioner society at Annexure-G and G1. b. To quash the endorsement dated:25.10.2019 passed by the respondent vide Annexure-H. 3. Heard the arguments and perused the Writ papers with care. 4. AGA on instruction submits that the petitioner Society has already submitted the audit report and there is no provision under the law to accept the revised audit report of the petitioner society. AGA therefore, submits that an appropriate order may be passed. The oral submission made by AGA is placed on record. 5. Because the audit report has already been submitted by the petitioner Society, mandamus cannot be ordered to accept the revised audit report. However, this order will not came in the way for the petitioner to take action in accordance with the law. - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:1754 WP No. 1893 of 2021 6. Resultantly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17