Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25303 (AP)

V.Venkateswara Reddy v. Union of India

WP/16540/2018 · 2025-06-23

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: (Special Original Jurisdiction) •C‘V * TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JLf^ TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE .C, * 'i %4 rf PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA / WRIT PETITION NO: 16540 OF 2018 / Between: V.Venkateswara Reddy, S/o V.Bala Nagi Reddy, aged about 41 years, Occ. Constable (RPF), R/o H.No.18-4-111/24, Railway Colony, Tirupathi, Chittoor District. ...Petitioner AND 1. Union of India, rep by its General Manager, South Central Railway, Rail Nilayam, Secunderabad, Telangana State. 2. The IG and Chief Security Commissioner, Special Intelligence Branch Security Branch, Rail Nilayam, Secunderabad 3. The Assistant Security Commissioner, South Central Railway, Special Intelligence Branch, Secunderabad. 4. The Inspector Railway Protection Force, Special Intelligence Branch, South Central Railway, Guntakal, Anantapur District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring action of the 2nd respondent in transferring the petitioner from Tirupathi to Guntakal vide Force Order No.39/2018 dated 25-4-2018 is illegal, arbitrary and consequently set aside the same. lA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Suspend the Force Order No.39/2018 dated 25-4-2018 issued by the 2nd respondent in so far as petitioner is concerned transferring from Tirupathi to Guntakal, pending disposal of the above Writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. K NARSI REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: SRI JUPUDI V K YAGNADUTT(CENTRAL GOVERNMENT COUNSEL) The Court made the following order: Il ■'APHC010357982018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 16540/2018 Between: V.VENKATESWARA REDDY, S/0 V.BALA NAGI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, OCC. CONSTABLE (RPF), R/0 H.N0.18-4-111/24, RAILWAY COLONY, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.UNION OF INDIA, REP BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER, SOUTH CENTRAL RAILWAY, T ELAN GANA STATE. 2.THE IG ANDCHIEF SECURITY COMMISSIONER, SPECIAL INTELLIGENCE BRANCH SECURITY BRANCH, RAIL NILAYAM, SECUNDERABAD - 3.THE ASSISTANT SECURITY COMMISSIONER, SOUTH CENTRAL RAILWAY, SPECIAL INTELLIGENCE BRANCH, SECUNDERABAD. 4.THE INSPECTOR RAILWAY PROTECTION FORCE, SPECIAL INTELLIGENCE BRANCH, SOUTH CENTRAL RAILWAY, GUNTAKAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. \ \ *■ RAIL NILAYAM, SECUNDERABAD, ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: TKNARSI REDDY Counsel for the Respon^ent(S): 1. JUPUDI V K YAGNADUTT(CENTRAL GOVERNMENT COUNSEL) The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus, declaring action of the 2nd respondent in transferring the petitioner from Tirupathi to Guntakal vide Force Order No. 39/2018 dated 25-4-2018 is illegal, arbitrary and consequently set aside the same. ” 2 2. yVhen the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri K.Narsi Reddy, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that no further orders are required in this matter as the relief sought in this petition has become infructuous. 3. Learned counsel for the Respondents would submit that Court pass appropriate orders. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is dismissed as the relief has become infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand may closed. Sd/- P. VINOD KUMAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri. K Narsi Reddy Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to Sri. Jupudi V K Yagnadutt(Central Government Counsel) [OPUC] 3. Three CD Copies GSC n HIGH COURT DATED:24/06/2025 ORDER WP.No.16540 of 2018 0 5 AUG 2025 VirSil!i[«nt Sectioiu^’^ 0 5 ml DISMISSING THE WP AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS