1 2025:CGHC:13050 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 419 of 2022 • Gayatri Agrawal W/o Late Omprakash Agrawal Aged About 58 Years R/o Danipara, Raigarh, Tahsil - Raigarh (Plaintiff No.1), District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. Karnel Singh Choudhary S/o Roshanlal Choudari Aged About 31 Years R/o Near Kotara Naka, Raigarh, Tahsil - Raigarh (Defendant No.1), District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 2. R.L Choudhary S/o P.R. Choudhary Aged About 78 Years R/o Near Kotara Naka, Raigarh, Tahsil - Raigarh (Defendant No.2), District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 3. Balram Vishwakarma S/o Maldev Vishwakarma Aged About 58 Years R/o Near Kotara Naka, Raigarh, Tehsil - Raigarh (Defendant No.3), District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 4. Smt. Sona Choudhary W/o R.L. Choudhary Aged About 58 Years R/o Near Kotara Naka, Raigarh, Tahsil - Raigarh (Defendant No.4), District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 5. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Raigarh (Defendant No.5), District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 6. Commissioner Nagar Nigam, Raigarh, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 7. Ritu Rungta D/o Late Omprakash Agrawal Aged About 37 Years R/o Danipara, Raigarh, Tehsil - Raigarh (Plaintiff No.2), District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 8. Pankaj Agrawal S/o Late Omprakash Agrawal Aged About 38 Years R/o Danipara, Raigarh, Tehsil - Raigarh (Plaintiff No.3), District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 9. Vikash Agrawal S/o Late Omprakash Agrawal Aged About 38 Years R/o Danipara, Raigarh, Tehsil - Raigarh (Plaintiff No.4), District : Raigarh, SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Digitally signed by SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Date: 2025.03.19 17:42:39 +0530 2 Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) (Cause Title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Waquar Naiyer, Advocate For State : Mr. Shubham Bajpayee, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No. 4 : Mr. Rishabh Gupta, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Manoj Paranjpe, Advocate For Respondent No. 6 : Dr. Sudeep Agrawal, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 19. 03.2025 1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that by efflux of time, this petition has become infructuous. 2. No objection from the other side. 3. Taking into consideration the statement made by Mr. Naiyer, the instant petition is dismissed being rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge $iddhant