M/S RAITANI ENGINEERING WORKS PVT LTD v. INDIAN BANK AND 2 ORS
WP(C)/2458/2022 · 2025-12-17
Sanjay Kumar Medhi
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25301 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25301 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010065622022
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2458/2022 M/S RAITANI ENGINEERING WORKS PVT LTD A COMPANY CONSTITUTED UNDER THE INDIAN COMPANIES ACT, 1956 HAVING IT REGD. OFFICE AND HEAD OFFICE AT CAMPUS OF M. M.
CHAUDHURY, P. B. RAOD, REHABARI, GUWAHATI, -781008, ASSAM- REP.
BY ONE OF ITS DIRECTORS SHRI MAYUR RAITANI, S/O. SRI ANAND RAM RAITANI, R/O. 4TH FLOOR, NIRMAL SAGAR APARTMENT, OLD POST OFFICE LANE, REHABARI, GUWAHATI-781008, DIST. KAMRUP (M), ASSAM. VERSUS INDIAN BANK AND 2 ORS A BODY CORPORATE CONSTITUTED AND FUNCTIONING UNDER THE BANKING COMPANIES (ACQUISITION AND TRANSFER OF UNDERTAKING ACT), V OF 1970 HAVING ITS HEAD OFFICE AT 66M RAJAJI SALAI, CHENNAI-600001 AND CORPORATE OFFICE AT 254-260, AVVAI SHANMUGAM SALAI, ROYAPETTAH, 9 CHENNAI 600014 AND A BRANCH OFFICE SITUATED AT S.S. ROAD, LAKTOKIA, FANCY BAZAR, GUWAHATI0- 01, DIST. KAMRUP (M), ASSAM AND REP. HEREIN BY THE ADDL. GENERAL MANAGER OF THE BRANCH OFFICE SITUATED AT S.S. ROAD, LAKTOKIA, FANCY BAZAR, GUWAHATI-01, PIN-781001.
2:THE UNION OF INDIA REP. BY THE GENERAL MANAGER (CONSTRUCTION) N. F. RAILWAYS MALIGAON GUWAHATI-11 DIST. KAMRUP (M) ASSAM PIN-781011.
3:THE CHIEF ENGINEER (CONSTRUCTION-4)
Page No.# 2/2 N.F. RAILWAYS CONSTRUCTION ORGANISATION MALIGAON GUWAHATI-11 DIST. KAMRUP (M) ASSAM PIN-781011 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A BISWAS, MR R KALITA,MS S AHOM Advocate for the Respondent : ASSTT.S.G.I., MR H GUPTA, SC, INDIAN BANK (R-1)
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER 18.12.2025
Shri A. Biswas, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that by efflux of time, the matter has become infructuous. Also heard Shri H. Gupta, learned counsel, who appears for the Indian Bank –respondent no. 1. In view of the aforesaid submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant