1 2025:CGHC:45213-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 681 of 2017 Ramdas Agrawal (died) Through Lrs. 1(a) Draupadi Devi, aged about 73 years, W/o-Lt. Ramdas Agrawal, R/o Friends Colony, House No. 08, District Raigarh (C.G.) 1(B) Sunil Kumar Agrawal, aged about 53 years, S/o-Lt. Ramdas Agrawal, R/o Friends Colony, House No. 08, District Raigarh (C.G.) 1(C) Sushil Kumar Agrawal, aged about 49 years, S/o-Lt. Ramdas Agrawal, R/o Friends Colony, House No. 08, District Raigarh (C.G.) 1(D) Anil Kumar Agrawal, aged about 51 years, S/o-Lt. Ramdas Agrawal, R/o Friends Colony, House No. 08, District Raigarh (C.G.) 1(E) Neelam Agrawal, aged about 45 years, W/o- Anant Agrawal, R/o Ivory Heights, Flat No.502, Andheri Mumbai, District Mumbai City ... Applicants versus 1 - Gagan Rathi S/o Shri Madanlal Rathi, Aged About 46 Years R/o Beladula Road, Housing Board Colony, Raigarh. Tehsil And District Raigarh Chhattisgarh. 2 - Poonam Agrawal, D/o Shri Lalchand Agrawal, Aged About 48 Years Proprietor M/s Baidnath Foods, Village, Banjinpali, Tehsil And District Ramnivas Talkies Road, Raigarh Chhattisgarh. 3 - State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Collector, Raigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents SHUBHAM SINGH RAGHUVANSHI Digitally signed by SHUBHAM SINGH RAGHUVANSHI Date: 2025.09.10 16:01:19 +0530 2 For Applicant : Mr. Aishwarya Diwan, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Ajay Chandra, Advocate For Respondent No.2 : Mr. Harshwardhan, Advocate For Respondent No.3/State : Mr. Sharad Mishra, Panel Lawyer (Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal) (Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Order On Board 04/09/2025 1. Heard on admission. 2. Admit. 3. The case is listed today for orders on default as necessary amendment was not done. The delay in incorporating necessary amendment is condoned. Let the amendment be incorporated during course of the day. 4. Vide order dated 03.11.2015 of this Court, despite repeated calls, no one appeared on behalf of the Applicant, therefore, this Court has dismissed FA No.96/2014 for want of prosecution. 5. Taking into consideration the submission and cause shown in the application, we are inclined to restore FA No.96/2014. 6. Prayer for restoration of the appeal is allowed and FA No.96/2014 is restored to its original number. 7. Accordingly, the MCC is disposed of. Sd/- Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) Judge JUDGE Shubham