Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2025 DAILYLAW 253 (JK)

UT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AND ORS JAL SHAKTI DEPARTMENT v. RATTAN LAL

WP(C)/2127/2025 · 2026-03-11

Sanjay Parihar, Sanjeev Kumar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP(C) No. 2127/2025 1. UT of J&K through Commissioner Secretary to Govt. Jal Shakti (PHE) Deptt. Civil Secretariat J&K at Jammu, Civil Secretariat J&K at Jammu. 2. Chief Engineer, Jal Shakti (PHE) Deptt. Jammu-180001. 3. Executive Engineer, Jal Shakti (PHE) Mech. Division Rajouri-185131 Pronounced on:- 11.03.2026 Uploaded on:- 12.03.2026 …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Ms. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG vs Rattan Lal age 62 years S/o Sh. Balak Ram, R/o Village Peli, Tehsil Sunderbani, District Rajouri-185212 Mobile No. 9596659630 .…. Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Sheikh Najeeb, Advocate CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE ORDER (ORAL) 11.03.2026 Sanjeev Kumar ‘J’ 1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, filed by the Union Territory of J&K & Ors. is directed against an order and judgment dated 19.02.2025 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Jammu Bench at Jammu [“the Tribunal”] in O.A. No. 637 of 2024 titled “Rattan Lal and another Vs. Union Territory of J&K Serial No. 64 2 WP(C) No. 2127/2025 and others”, whereby the Tribunal, has, while allowing the O.A of the respondent, issued the following directions: (i) The impugned order of recovery qua the applicants is quashed and set aside and the respondents are directed not to recover any amount from the pay/pensionary benefits of the applicants. (ii) The respondents are directed to restore the pay/pension of the applicants which they were getting prior to the issuance of the impugned order. (iii) The amount recovered from the pay/pensionary benefits of the applicants, shall be refunded preferably within two months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. (iv) In the cases, where applicants have already retired, the respondents shall pay pension to the applicants on the basis of last pay drawn by the applicants. 2. The issue raised in this petition by the UT of J&K is squarely covered by a judgment passed in WP (C) No. 2416/2024 c/w WP (C) No. 3034/2024 titled “Sita Ram and Ors. vs. UT of J&K and Ors.” and “Karan Kumar vs. UT of J&K and Ors.” Respectively, decided by a Division Bench of this Court on 04.04.2025, which has been reaffirmed by a Division Bench of this Court in the case of “Union Territory of J&K and others Vs. Maqbool Sheikh” in WP (C) No. 936/2025 along with other clubbed matters; [2026:JKLHC-JMU:692- DB] decided on 06.03.2026. 3. In view of the aforesaid, the judgment impugned passed by the Tribunal is set aside in respect of direction Nos. (ii) and (iv) and is upheld in respect of direction Nos. (i) and (iii). 3 WP(C) No. 2127/2025 4. With the aforesaid modification in the judgment impugned, this petition is disposed of. (Sanjay Parihar) (Sanjeev Kumar) Judge Judge Jammu 11.03.2026 Vishal Sharma Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No