Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010224652025 2025:GAU-AS:15981 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/551/2025 SUSHIL KUMAR SAHA @ SHUSIL SAHA SON OF LATE SURHYA SAHA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE TANGNIBAZAR, P.O- DHULA, DISTRICT- DARRANG, ASSAM, PIN-784146 VERSUS DR ROVI KOTA AND 8 ORS. CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, ASSAM SECRETARIAT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6 2:SYEDAIN ABBASI SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM ASSAM SECRETARIAT DISPUR ASSAM 3:KAILASH KARTHIK N SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ASSAM AND MISSION DIRECTOR JAL JEVAN MISSION ASSAM SECRETARIAT DISPUR GUWAHATI ASSAM-781006 4:JAYANT NARLIKAR COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM FINANCE DEPARTMENT ASSAM SECRETARIAT DISPUR GUWAHATI-06 Page No.# 2/3 5:ASHOK KUMAR DEV CHOUDHURY CHIEF ENGINEER (WATER) PUBLIC HEALTH ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ASSAM AND ADDL. MISSION DIRECTOR (TECHNICAL) JAL JEEVAN MISSION ASSAM HANGRABARI GUWAHATI-06 6:AKASH DEEP IAS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL BODOFA NAGAR KOKRAJHAR ASSAM-783370 7:JATIN BORA SECRETARY FINANCE BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL KOKRAJHAR ASSAM-783370 8:SANTA BASUMATARY SECRETARY TO THE BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL BODOFA NAGAR KOKRAJHAR ASSAM-783370 9:PULAK BASUMATARY ASST. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (PHE) IN- CHARGE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (PHE) BAKSA DIVISION MUSHALPUR BTC ASSA Advocate for the petitioner(s): Mr. M Saikia Advocate for the respondent(s): Ms. NR Sarma, Standing Counsel, BTC B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH Page No.# 3/3 ORDER 24.11.2025 This Court vide an order dated 07.11.2025 had requested Mr. J Saikia, the learned Standing Counsel, BTC to obtain instruction(s) as to whether the direction(s) passed by this Court in the order dated 03.03.2025 in WP(C)No.7999/2022 has been duly complied with or not. 2. Today, Mr. NR Sarma, who is also the Standing Counsel, BTC has placed before this Court an instruction dated 12.11.2025, wherein it has been stated that due verification has been carried out and it was found that the petitioner is entitled to an amount of Rs.26,19,218/-.Further to that, the petitioner’s name has also been listed at Sl.No.188 of the chronological list which has been prepared in terms with Tamsher Ali and Ors. Vs. State of Assam and Ors., reported in 2008 (4) GLT 1. 3. The instruction so produced by the learned Standing Counsel, BTC is kept on record and marked with the letter ‘X’. 4. Taking into account the above, nothing further remains to be adjudicated upon in the instant contempt proceedings, for which, the contempt proceedings stands closed. 5. Liberty, however, is given to the petitioner in the circumstance, the petitioner is not paid in terms with Tamsher Ali (supra). JUDGE Comparing Assistant