APHC010356962025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI WRIT PETITION NO: 18370 OF 202^ PRATAPA Between: Vajrala Venkata Subba Reddy, S/o. Nagi Reddy, Aged Business, R/o. D.No3-92/1, Ankireddy Palem Village, Guntur District. about 63 years. Guntur Mandal, ...Petitioner AND 1. The Union of India, Rep by its Secretary, Home Department 2. The Superintendent of Police, CBI, Visakhapatnam. New Delhi. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith pleased to issue Writ the High Court may be or order or direction more particularly Writ in the nature any other appropriate Writ declaring the action of the of Writ Of Mandamus or 2nd Respondent as illegal, arbitrary and against Article 14 of the Constitution to conduct proper investigation representation dt. 29-05-2025 as per law. and consequently direct the 2ND Respondent independently and dispose off the Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI PADALA VENKATA SRIRAM REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.1: OF INDIA Counsel for the Respondent No. Prosecutor for CBI The Court made the following order: additional solicitor general 2: P S P SURESH KUMAR, Spl. Public APHC010356962025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 18370/2025 Between: 1.VAJRALA VENKATA SUBBA REDDY, S/O.NAGI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS. BUSINESS, R/0.D.N03-92/1, ANKIREDDY PALEM VILLAGE, GUNTUR MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE UNION OF INDIA, REP BY ITS SECRETARY DEPARTMENT, NEW DELHI. 2.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CBI, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ or order or direction more particularly Writ in the nature of Writ Of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ declaring the action of the 2^^ Respondent as illegal, arbitrary and against Article 14 of the Constitution and consequently direct the 2"'^ Respondent to conduct proper investigation independently and dispose of the representation dt.29-05-2025 as per law and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PADALA VENKATA SRIRAM REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. P S P SURESH KUMAR, Spl. Public Prosecutor for CBI HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: .... to issue Writ or order or direction more particularly Writ in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ declaring the action of the 2"^ Respondent as illegal, arbitrary and against Article 14 of 2 the Constitution and consequently, direct the T'^ Respondent to conduct proper investigation independently and dispose of the representation dt.29- 05-2025 as per law and to pass 2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that despite the petitioner's representation dated 29.05.2025, respondent police either registered a case against the persons named in his representation nor enquired into the court. 3. Learned Special Public Prosecutor for CBI appearing for respondents on instructions would submit that before registering a case against the officials, at first, respondent Police have to conduct a preliminary enquiry and that this Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Respondent Police directed to take necessary steps on the representation of the Petitioner and initiate further course of action according to law. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. ■ • are Sd/-B.PRASADA RAO TRAR ASSISTANT //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1. The Secretary, Union of India, Home Department 2. The Superintendent of Police, CBI, Visakhapatnam. 3. One CC to Sri. Padala Venkata Sriram Reddy Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to Sri. PSP Suresh Kumar, Spl. Public Prosecutor for CBI [OPUC] 5. One CC to Additional Solicitor General of India [OPUC] 6. Two CD Copies GSC New Delhi. *2 HIGH COURT DATED:07/08/2025 ORDER WP NO. 18370 OF 2025 V 01 SEP 2025 /sa iSQyrrwrt Sectionxv;^ o disposing the WP WITHOUT COSTS