Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25286 (AP)

THANNIRU CHANDRASEKHAR v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/18194/2024 · 2025-09-14

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010357472024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 18194/2024 Between: Thanniru Chandrasekhar ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SASANKA BHUVANAGIRI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV 2. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following: 2 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.18194 OF 2024 ORDER 1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has awarded the various works i.e., Supply, Delivery of Water Supply Materials for 2 to 18 Wards of Narasaraopet Municipality vide agreement No.18/2023-24, dated 22.05.2023 and Supply, Delivery of Water Supply Materials for 19th to 34th wards and 1st ward of Narasaraopet vide Agreement No.19/2023-24, dated 22.05.2023, respectively. 2. The learned counsel further submits that the petitioner duly executed all the works and thereafter submitted final bills and the final bills were duly endorsed by the competent authority and the bills also the bills were also uploaded in the CFMS Portal. However, in spite of the completion of all procedural formalities, the payment towards the completed works has not been released till date. 3. Heard the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Pleader for Municipal Administration & Urban Development, the learned Standing Counsel for the Corporation and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Finance and Planning. 4. During the course of hearing, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Corporation does not dispute the submissions made by the petitioner with respect to the completion of the work undertaken. 5. Considering the submissions, respondent Nos.2,3,5,6 and 7 are hereby directed to verify and release the payments due payable to the petitioner 3 as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. 7. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N KGM 4 504 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 18194 of 2024 Dated 15.09.2025 KGM