C Jayasankara Reddy v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP(AT)/712/2021 · 2025-07-08
B S Bhanumathi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25284 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25284 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010357322021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3311] Wednesday, the ninth day of July two thousand and twenty five
Present The Honourable Ms Justice B.S. Bhanumathi Writ Petition (A.T.) No: 712 of 2021
Between:
1. C.Jayasankara reddy, s/o c. yella reddy, aged about 49 years, multi-purpose health extension officer, community health centre, Panyam, Kurnool district ( presently working on work allotment basis at primary health centre, chapirevula, kurnool district)
...Petitioner And
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Principal Secretary, Health, Medical and family Welfare Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur District - 522002.
2. Director Of Health And Family Welfare, State Of Andhra Pradesh, Gollapudi, Vijayawada, Krishna District.
3. Regional Director of Medical and Health Services, Kadapa.
4. District Medical and Health Officer, Kurnool, Kurnool district.
...Respondents: Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.A.Y.Vishesh Kumar
Counsel for the Respondents:
1. G.P. for services IV
2 W.P. (A.T)No.712 of 2021
The Court made the following:
O R D E R:
This petition is filed to declare the action of the respondents in posting the applicant at Primary Health Centre, Chapirevula from Primary Health Centre, Nannur vide proceedings in Rc.No.2661/E3/2015, dated 15-6-2016 issued by the District Medical and Health Officer, Kurnool and not paying HRA applicable to the place where the applicant is working as wholly illegal, arbitrary, and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and consequently declare that the applicant is entitled to be posted at Primary Health Centre, Nannur with 20 percent H.R.A.
2. Sri M. Eswar, learned counsel representing the counsel for the applicant submitted that the relief sought in the petition has become infructuous.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
________________ B.S.BHANUMATHI Dt.09.07.2025
PNV