Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25281 (JHR)

MD SAHID v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./6333/2024 · 2025-05-08

Sri Ananda Sen

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:13949 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.6333 of 2024 ------ 1. Md. Shahid 2. Jamila @ Jamila Khatun. … … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. Md. Jamshed Khan. … … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Kumar Sharma, Advocate For the State : Mr. Abhay Kr. Tiwari, A.P.P. ----- 04/ 08.05.2025 This anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, has been preferred by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Katkamsandi P.S. Case No.107 of 2024, for offences under Sections 323, 341, 506, 420, 467, 468, 384, 387 and 120-B IPC. The case is presently pending before the Court of learned J.M. 1st Hazaribagh. 2. The allegation against the petitioners is of extorting money by blackmailing the complainant in the garb of usurping the land. 3. Learned A.P.P. representing the State on instruction of the Investigating Officer submits that notice under Section 41A Cr.P.C. has been issued to the petitioners and they have appeared in compliance of the same. Learned A.P.P. further submits that he got instruction from the Investigating Officer that there is no necessity to arrest the petitioners. 4. Issuance of notice under Section 41A Cr.P.C. by the 2025:JHHC:13949 2 Investigating Officer, clearly suggests that there is no imminent threat of arrest of the petitioners. 5. However, the petitioners should cooperate with the investigation and appear before the Court concerned who will consider the case of the petitioner in terms of the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court. 6. With the aforesaid observation, this Anticipatory Bail Application stands disposed of. (ANANDA SEN, J.) Prashant. Cp-3