JUJHAAR SINGH @ JASSI S/O MAHENDRA SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/72/2025 · 2025-01-15
Anil Kumar Upman
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2528 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2528 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:2016] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 72/2025 Jujhaar Singh @ Jassi S/o Mahendra Singh, R/o Baal, Police Station Dablana District Bundi (Raj.), At Present R/o Amer Nagal Mod Kunda, Police Station Amer, District Jaipur (Raj.) (Presently In Sub Central Jail, Bundi (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Yuvraj Singh Mr. Aditya Mishra For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 15/01/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.278/2023 registered at Police Station Kotwali Bundi, District Bundi for the offence punishable under Section 379 of IPC. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submit that alleged offence is triable by Magistrate and maximum punishment for such offence is three years. It is submitted that petitioner is in custody since long. Charge-sheet has been filed, trial will take time in its conclusion and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. [2025:RJ-JP:2016] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-72/2025]
3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner. He submits that petitioner is a habitual offender as 18 other cases have been registered against him. Thus, bail should not be granted to petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, as also the fact that alleged offence is triable by Magistrate for which maximum punishment is three years; charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6.
This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Jujhaar Singh @ Jassi S/o Mahendra Singh, shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence in first week of every month, till trial is
[2025:RJ-JP:2016] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-72/2025] concluded. 8. If breach of this condition is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial court to cancel the bail granted to the petitioner by this Court. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /312