Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2528 (GAU)

JITEN KALITA v. MS. L S CHANGSAN AND 4 ORS.

Cont.Cas(C)/387/2025 · 2026-01-27

Sanjay Kumar Medhi

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010163132025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/387/2025 JITEN KALITA S/O LATE GOBINDA KALITA, R/O BASISTHAPUR BYE LANE NO. 2, RASARAJ PATH, P.O.- BELTOLA, P.S.- HATIGAON, DIST- KAMRUP (M), ASSAM, PIN-781028 VERSUS MS. L S CHANGSAN AND 4 ORS. THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY, REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, ASSAM SECRETARIAT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06 2:OINAM SARANKUMAR SINGH SECRETARY TO THE WATER RESOURCE DEPARTMENT WATER RESOURCE DEPARTMENT THE GOVT. OF ASSAM ASSAM SECRETARIAT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6 3:BHASKAR JYOTI SARMA THE CHIEF ENGINEER WATER RESOURCE DEPARTMENT GOVT. OF ASSAM GUWAHATI-3 ASSAM 4:DIPEN SARMAH THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER WATER RESOURCE DEPARTMENT GUWAHATI EAST WATER RESOURCE DIVISION GUWAHATI- 08 Page No.# 2/3 ASSAM 5:SUMIT SATTAWAN THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER CUM CHAIRMAN DISTRICT DISASTER MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY ASSAM KAMRUP METRO HENGRABARI 78103 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N J GOGOI, MS. S DEB Advocate for the Respondent : MR S DUTTA, MS U DAS BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER 28.01.2026 Heard Shri N.J. Gogoi, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. U. Das as well as Shri S. Dutta, learned counsel for the respondents. The instant petition has been instituted complaining willful and deliberate disobedience against the order dated 26.07.2024 passed in WP(C)/1856/2023. When this matter had come up for consideration on earlier occasions, instructions were directed to be obtained. Both Ms. Das and Shri Dutta, learned counsel for the respondents have informed this Court that the amount in question has been released recently. In this regard, they have placed before this Court a copy of the communication dated 22.01.2026. Shri Gogoi, learned counsel for the petitioner has, however, informed that he has no instructions with regard to the aspect of receipt of such payment. Be that as it may, in view of the categorical statement supported by the recent order dated 22.01.2026, this Court is of the opinion that there may not be any further requirement to continue with this proceeding. Page No.# 3/3 The contempt petition is accordingly closed. A copy of the communication dated 22.01.2026 along with its enclosures are made part of the records. JUDGE Comparing Assistant