Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25277 (CHH)

SURYA PRAKASH SAHU (DIED) THROUGH LRS (A) HEMLATA @ HEMALATA SAHU v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

MCC/603/2025 · 2025-06-25

Shri Sanjay K Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 (MCC No. 603 of 2025) 2025:CGHC:28237 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 603 of 2025 1 - Surya Prakash Sahu (Died) Through Lrs 1.1 - (A) Hemlata @ Hemalata Sahu W/o Late Shri Surya Prakash Sahu Aged About 36 Years R/o Bazar Para, Sakri, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 1.2 - (B) Devendra Sahu S/o Late Shri Surya Prakash Sahu Aged About 15 Years (Minor) Through His Guardian And Mother Hemlata @ Hemalata Sahu W/o Late Shri Surya Prakash Sahu, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Bazar Para, Sakri, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 1.3 - (C) Bhavya Sahu D/o Late Shri Surya Prakash Sahu Aged About 9 Years (Minor) Through Her Guardian And Mother Hemlata @ Hemalata Sahu W/o Late Shri Surya Prakash Sahu, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Bazar Para, Sakri, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh --- Applicant(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Home Department Police Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Director General Of Police Police Head Quarter, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Inspector General Of Police Durg Range, Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Superintendent Of Police Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. --- Non-applicant(s) (Cause-title taken from the Case Information System) ADITI DIWAN KAIWART Digitally signed by ADITI DIWAN KAIWART Date: 2025.06.28 10:44:32 +0530 2 (MCC No. 603 of 2025) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Applicant :- Mr. Aman Tamboli, Advocate For Non-applicant-State :- Mr. Sharad Mishra, Panel Lawyer ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 26.06.2025 1. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the defaults have been rectified. 2. With the consent of the parties, heard finally. 3. This MCC has been filed seeking restoration of WPS No.2555/2016, which was dismissed for want of prosecution by order of this Court dated 12.09.2024. 4. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. WPS No.2555/2016 is restored to its original number for its hearing and disposal in accordance with law. 5. Accordingly, this MCC is allowed. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge @d!t!