Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25271 (JHR)

ANAND JHA ALIAS ANAND KUMAR JHA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./8592/2025 · 2025-09-25

Deepak Roshan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:30192 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8592 of 2025 --------- Anand Jha @ Anand Kumar Jha, aged about 25 years, son of Bijay Krishna Jha, resident of Bandhpara, near Thakurbari Mandir, Dumka, P.O.-Dumka, P.S.-Dumka (T), District- Dumka. ....Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. ....Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Pran Pranay, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. V.S. Sahay, A.P.P. For the Informant : M/s. Vani Kumari, Manisha Shaily Nag, Advocates --------- 02/Dated:-25.09.2025 1. Heard learned counsels for the parties. 2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 140(3), 103(1), 238, 3(5) of B.N.S., 2023 in connection with Dumka (M) P.S. Case No.08/2025 corresponding to G.R. Case No.176/2025. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and he has not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R. He further submits that there is no eye witness to the alleged occurrence. He further submits that the charge-sheet has been submitted on 11.04.2025 and out of 12 charge- sheeted witnesses none of them has been examined. He further submits that the petitioner for no offence has been languishing in custody since 14.01.2025; as such, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. He submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by every condition as imposed by this court. 4. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 5. Having regard to the facts of the case and looking to the allegation made against this petitioner coupled with the fact that out of 12 charge-sheeted witnesses none of them has been examined as such, there is no likelihood of early conclusion of trial and the petitioner is in custody since 14.01.2025; therefore, I am inclined to enlarge this petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M. Dumka in connection with Dumka (M) P.S. Case No.08/2025 corresponding to G.R. Case No.176/2025. 6. It is made clear that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and he shall not threaten any witnesses and shall co- operate in trial and if any adverse report will come against this petitioner, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of this petitioner. (Deepak Roshan, J.) vikas/-