Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25264 (BOM)

SARUBAI SURESH MAGAR AND ORS v. KIRAN VASUDEO HALDE AND ORS

CA/12959/2022 · 2025-02-04

Shri Sandipkumar C More

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

916 CA 12959-2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 916 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 12959 OF 2022 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 23258 OF 2022 SARUBAI SURESH MAGAR AND OTHERS VERSUS KIRAN VASUDEO HALDE AND OTHERS ... Mr. P.C. Mayure h/f. Mr. S.S. Chapalgaonkar – Advocate for Applicants …. CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J. DATE : 4th February, 2025 PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel for applicants – claimants. The respondents despite service remained absent. The applicants are seeking condonation of delay of 1232 days in filing First Appeal. 2. There is no oppose to the application, therefore the application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause ‘B’ subject to deposit of cost of Rs.2,000/- (rupees Two thousands only) to be paid to the Registry of this Court for utilization of High Court Dispensary, Bench at Aurangabad. 3. The application is disposed of. Pooja Kale 1/2 2025:BHC-AUG:3135 916 CA 12959-2022 4. It is made clear that, the applicants/claimants shall not claim any interest for the aforesaid period of delay. 5. Appeal be registered after deposit of cost and removal of office objections, if any. [ SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE ] JUDGE Pooja Kale 2/2