VIJENDRA KUMAR SON OF SHRI ROSHAN LAL v. SHRI SANJAY MALHOTRA
CCP/656/2024 · 2025-04-30
Anand Sharma, Shree Chandrashekhar
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25261 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25261 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:18175-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 656/2024
1. Vijendra Kumar Son Of Shri Roshan Lal, Aged About 37 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 08, Jhanjha, Tehsil Buhana, Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan - 333502,pan No. Dnupk5006E
2. Ram Kishan Son Of Shri Veer Singh, Aged About 40 Years, R/o. Ward No. 08, Jhanjha, Tehsil Buhana, Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan - 333502, Pan No. Gngpk1309R. ----Petitioners Versus
1. Shri Sanjay Malhotra, Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Shri Chinmayi Goyal, District Collector, Distt. Jhunjhunu (Raj.)
3. Shri Hemant Kumar, Sub Divisional Officer, Buhana, Distt. Jhunjhunu.
4. Shri Dharmendra Jandu, Tehsildar, Tehsil Buhana, Distt. Jhunjhunu
5. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Virender Godara For Respondent(s) : Ms. Shikha Sharma on behalf of Mr. GS Gill, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Order 30/04/2025 On 14th October 2022, the following order was passed by this Court in D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.15090/2022:-
“The relief in the writ petition is with regard to removal of encroachment.
[2025:RJ-JP:18175-DB] (2 of 2) [CCP-656/2024] We find that the Tehsildar has initiated proceedings under Section 91 of the Land Revenue Act by issuing notices, which have been placed on record. Considering that the proceedings have been drawn on 26.07.2022, all that we would observe is that the Tehsildar shall do well to conclude the enquiry as early as possible in this case. With this direction, the present writ petition is
disposed off.”
2. This is not in dispute that the Tehsildar has concluded the enquiry proceedings.
3. While so, the present contempt petition shall not lie and is dismissed as such.
(ANAND SHARMA),J (SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR),J RAHUL/63