[2025:RJ-JP:16820] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15491/2016 Prem Chand Sain son of Shri Johari Lal Sain, aged about 45 years, R/o village Iswana, Post Babeli, Tehsil Rajgarh, District Alwar. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Rajasthan, through the Principal Secretary, Department of Forest, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Dy. Conservator of Forest, Forest Department, Naya Bas Ka Chauraha, Alwar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rahul Lodha, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 21/04/2025 1. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. 2. In the instant writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for issuing a direction to the respondents to consider his case for regularization of his services in the light of judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of State of Karnataka Vs. Uma Devi reported in 2006(4) SCC 1. 3. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has pointed out from reply to the writ petition that although the respondents are ready to consider the case of petitioner for regularization of his services, yet on asking for proof of his age, he has submitted five different documents like ration card, identity card issued by Election Department, one document from Rashtriya Mukt Vidhalya, one affidavit and one another ration card in which different date of birth of the petitioner have been shown. [2025:RJ-JP:16820] (2 of 2) [CW-15491/2016] 4. Learned counsel for the respondents have also submitted that even after submitting contradictory documents, in order to ascertaining the correct age, the respondents have asked the petitioner to appear before the Medical Board so that his correct age can be ascertained. Only after determining correct age of the petitioner, his matter for regularization of his services can be considered. 5. In view of the above, the petitioner is directed to appear before the Medical Board to be constituted by the respondents for the purpose of ascertainment of his correct age. 6. In case, such medical examination has not been conducted so far, the respondents would issue one letter requiring the petitioner to appear before the Medical Board and in case, such medical examination has not been already done till the date then the same would be done on the date to be assigned by the respondents in their letter and after deciding his age on the basis of opinion of the Medical Board, necessary orders with regard to regularization of the petitioner shall be passed, in case, he is otherwise eligible for regularization of his services. 7. It is made clear that in case, the petitioner does not appear, despite sending above letter from the respondents, he would not be entitled for any relief whatsoever. 8. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of in the light of the above directions. 9. Stay application as well as all pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (ANAND SHARMA),J DAKSH/210