SWAROOP SINGH PARIHAR S/O SHRI SUGAN SINGH JI v. HINDUSTAN PETROLEUM CORPORATION LIMITED
WRW/112/2021 · 2025-05-21
Mahendar Kumar Goyal
Review Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25258 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25258 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:21377] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Review Petition No.112/2021 In SB. Civil Writ Petition No.6245/2021 Swaroop Singh Parihar S/o Shri Sugan Singh Ji, Aged About 55 Years, R/o 20 A Vardhman Nagar B, Ajmer Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Presently Working At LPG Plant Naseerabad, District Ajmer, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, (A Government Of India Enterprises) Through Chairman And Mangaing Director, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, 17, Jamshed Ji Tata Road, Church Gate, Mumbai.
2. The General Manager, LPG, North-West Zone, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, Ahmadabad.
3. The Senior Regional Manager, Jaipur, LPG, Regional Office, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, Jaipur.
4. The Executive Director-LPG, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited, 17, Jamshed Ji Tata Road, Church Gate, Mumbai.
5. The Senior Plant Manager, Ajmer, LPG Plant Nasirabad, District Ajmer, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. A.K. Sharma, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rachit Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bhrigu Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Judgment / Order 21/05/2025
[2025:RJ-JP:21377] (2 of 2) [WRW-112/2021] This review petition is disposed of in following terms as agreed and requested by learned counsels for the respective parties:-
1. The observation of this Court in the order under review dated 03.09.2021 to the effect that
“however, in view of the fact that the appellate authority has failed even to follow the directions given by this Court, the appellate authority is now
directed to decide the appeal within a period of four weeks from the date a copy of this order is placed by the petitioner with the appellate authority” be treated to be deleted as the appeal was already decided by the appellate authority before the order dated 03.09.2021 came to be passed.
2. This order may be treated as part and parcel of the order dated 03.09.2021. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J YOGESH/98