Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25256 (KAR)

SURESH KUMAR VIRMANI v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/5145/2023 · 2025-06-17

J M Khazi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21037 CRL.P No. 5145 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 5145 OF 2023 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. SURESH KUMAR VIRMANI S/O LATE SH.SHYAM LAL VIRMANI AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS 2. BHAG VIRMANI W/O SURESH KUMAR VIRMANI AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS BOTH ARE R/AT HOUSE NO.576, SECTOR-37 FARIDABAD-121001 NO.101, ANUGRAHA BUILDING, 1ST CROSS, MUNIREDDY LAYOUT, KADUBESANAHALLI, BENGALURU CITY, KARNATAKA - 560103 …PETITIONERS (BY SMT. SHOBHA SHIVARAMESH GOWDA R, ADVOCATE- ABSENT) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY HOSKOTE POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR BANGALORE Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21037 CRL.P No. 5145 of 2023 2. MONICA AGRAWAL W/O ASHISH VIRAMANI, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, NO.101, ANUGRAHA BUILDING, 1ST CROSS, MUNIREDDY LAYOUT, BENGALURU - 560103 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.M.R.PATIL, HCGP FOR R1) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 482 CR.PC BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO QUASHING OF PETITIONERS NAME FROM THE FIR IN CR.NO.488/2017 OF HOSAKOTE P.S., BENGALURU RURAL AND CHARGE SHEET IN C.C.NO.59329/2018 PENDING ON THE FILE OF XXIX ADDL.C.M.M., BENGALURU UNDER THE ABOVE MENTIONED FACTS. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MS JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI ORAL ORDER No representation for petitioners. No representation for petitioners even in the afternoon session. Vide order dated 19.11.2024, a conditional order was passed to the effect that if office objections are not - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21037 CRL.P No. 5145 of 2023 complied within one week, the matter will be dismissed for non-prosecution. Despite the said order, there is no representation for petitioners and office objections are also not complied with. It appears petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (J.M.KHAZI) JUDGE RR List No.: 2 Sl No.: 24