Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25245 (KAR)

M/S JAYASURYA DEVELOPERS v. SRI B H SRINIVAS

CRL.A/685/2014 · 2025-01-30

Shivashankar Amarannavar

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:4446 CRL.A No. 685 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 685 OF 2014 BETWEEN: M/S JAYASURYA DEVELOPERS REGISTERED PARTNERSHIP FIRM HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT No.17, SHANTHI NIVAS 2ND MAIN ROAD, 3RD CROSS K.H.M.BLOCK, GANGANAGAR BANGALORE – 560 032. DULY REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNERS SRI L.S.NARAYANA REDDY @ BHARGAV. …APPELLANT (BY SRI UNNIKRISHNAN M, ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: SRI B H SRINIVAS SON OF SRI HANUMANTHARAYAPPA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS R/AT No.11, B.K.HALLI, JALA HOBLI BANGALORE NORTH TALUK BANGALORE DISTRICT – 560 056. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI AJAY KUMAR N, ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 378 (4)Cr.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 15.07.2014 PASSED BY THE XXVII ADDL.CMM, AT BANGALORE IN C.C.No.40635/2011. CONSEQUENTLY, CONVICT THE RESPONDENT/ACCUSED AS PRAYED IN C.C.No.40635/2011 AS PER SECTION 138 OF THE N.I.ACT AND ETC., Digitally signed by HEMAVATHY GANGABYRAPPA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:4446 CRL.A No. 685 of 2014 THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR ORAL JUDGMENT 1. Learned counsel for appellant is absent. There is no representation on appellant’s side. Learned counsel for appellant was also absent on 16.02.2024, 05.08.2024 and 13.01.2025. On 13.01.2025 this Court passed the following order: “Learned Counsel for the appellant is absent. There is no representation for the appellant. Learned Counsel for the respondent is present. The appeal is of the year 2014 and there are no reasons for adjourning the matter. However, in order to give a final opportunity to the appellant, the matter is adjourned. List after two weeks.” - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:4446 CRL.A No. 685 of 2014 2. The appeal is of the year 2014 and there are no reasons for adjourning the matter. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE LRS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 61