[2025:RJ-JP:30567] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9292/2025 1. Kripal Ram S/o Choturam, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Juglipura Police Station Arai District Ajmer. (At Present Sub Jail Sambhar) 2. Akhram S/o Choturam, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Juglipura Police Station Arai District Ajmer. (At Present Sub Jail Sambhar) 3. Kuldeep Choudhary S/o Kripal Choudhary, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Juglipura Police Station Arai District Ajmer. (At Present Sub Jail Sambhar) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashvin Garg with Mr. Nonit Hatila For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 07/08/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.144/2025 registered at Police Station Dudu, District Jaipur Rural for the offences punishable under Sections 190, 191(2), 115(2), 126(2), 109(2), 329(3) and 191(3) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, (in short, ‘BNS’) 2023. Investigation is being conducted for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 110, 117(2), 329(3) and 3(5) of BNS, 2023. [2025:RJ-JP:30567] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-9292/2025] 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that cross cases have been registered between the parties and both sides have sustained injuries. It is submitted that none of the injuries sustained by the injured has been opined as dangerous to life. It is contended that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioners and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Counsel submits that petitioners are in custody since 10.07.2025 and further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioners. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners, especially considering the fact that none of the injuries sustained by the injured has been opined as dangerous to life, there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioners and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow this bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners – (1) Kripal Ram S/o Choturam, (2) Akhram S/o Choturam, and (3) Kuldeep Choudhary S/o Kripal Choudhary, shall be released on bail provided, each of them shall furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- [2025:RJ-JP:30567] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-9292/2025] (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /416