Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25242 (GAU)

SARADA DEVI v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS

I.A.(Crl.)/842/2025 · 2025-12-09

Pranjal Das

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010133902025 2025:GAU-AS:17089 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Crl.Pet./709/2025 RAJIB LUTHANI ALIAS RAJIB LONGTHULU AND ANR SON OF SRI BIREN LUNTHANI R/O VILL- LOKHRA KHEPINJAL, LOKHRA, GUWAHATI, P.S. GORCHUK, P.O. ODALBAKRA DIST. KAMRUP (M), ASSAM PIN-781034 2: SAHIH LUNTHANI @ NANDESWAR LUTHANI @ NANDESWAR LONGTHULU S/O SRI BIRANDI LUNTHANI R/O VILL- LOKHRA KHEPINJAL LOKHRA GUWAHATI P.S. GORCHUK P.O. ODALBAKRA DIST. KAMRUP (M) ASSAM PIN-78103 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM 2:SMTI. SARADA DEVI W/O MEGH PRASAD UPADHAY R/O VILL- LOKHRA BETKUCHI GUWAHATI Page No.# 2/3 P.S. GORCHUK P.O. ODALBAKRA DIST. KAMRUP ASSAM PIN-78103 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. T DEURI, U BHARADWAJ,MS. L WANGSA,MS A DAS Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MD B ISLAM (R-2),MR. A A MONDAL(R-2),MS. J AHMED(R-2),MR A ALAM(R-2),MR S HUSSAIN(R-2) Linked Case : I.A.(Crl.)/842/2025 SARADA DEVI W/O MEGH PRASAD UPADHAY R/O VILL- LOKHRA BETKUCHI GUWAHATI P.S. GORCHUK P.O. ODALBAKRA DIST. KAMRUP ASSAM PIN-781034 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS REP BY THE PP ASSAM 2:RAJIB LUTHANI ALIAS RAJIB LONGTHULU SON OF SRI BIREN LUNTHANI R/O VILL- LOKHRA KHEPINJAL LOKHRA GUWAHATI P.S. GORCHUK P.O. ODALBAKRA DIST. KAMRUP (M) ASSAM PIN-781034 3:SAHIH LUNTHANI @ NANDESWAR LUTHANI @ NANDESWAR LONGTHULU S/O SRI BIRANDI LUNTHANI R/O VILL- LOKHRA KHEPINJAL LOKHRA GUWAHATI P.S. GORCHUK P.O. ODALBAKRA DIST. KAMRUP (M) ASSAM PIN-781034 Page No.# 3/3 ------------ Advocate for : MR B ISLAM Advocate for : PP ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS ORDER Date : 10.12.2025 Heard Md. B. Islam, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. T. Deuri, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2 and Mr. K. Baishya, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. In view of the judgment and order passed in main case i.e. Criminal Petition No. 709/2025, the instant interlocutory application for stay vacating has become infructuous and disposed of accordingly. JUDGE Comparing Assistant