Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25234 (GAU)

RASHIM UDDIN v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

Bail Appln./3849/2025 · 2025-11-30

Pranjal Das

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010262272025 2025:GAU-AS:16389 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./3849/2025 RASHIM UDDIN S/O TASAR ALI, R/O VILL. DALUACHERRA, P.S. RATABARI, DIST. SRIBHUMI, ASSAM, PIN 788710 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM. Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S C BISWAS, MS. S. CHANDA,MS. U NANDA,MS. J GHOSH,MR A IKBAL Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS O R D E R 01.12.2025 Heard Mr. S.C. Biswas, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P. Borthakur, learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State respondent. Page No.# 2/3 2. This application under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 has been filed by the accused petitioner, namely, Rashim Uddin praying for grant of bail in connection with Sessions Case No. 203/2025, under Sections 329(4)/296/109/117/118(2)/351(2) /3(5) of BNS, 2023, arising out of Ratabari P.S. Case No. 148/2025 under Sections 329(4)/296/109/117/118(2)/351(2) / 3(5) of BNS, 2023. The accused was arrested on 03.09.2025 and stated to have completed 89 days. 3. The case is stated to have been charge-sheeted. Copies of the relevant documents including the charge-sheet dated 29.09.2025 (C.S. No. 125/2025 has been annexed). From the annexed materials, it is revealed that the charge has also been framed against the petitioner and the trial has commenced. 4. Considering the length of detention and also the completion of investigation, I am of the considered view that the accused/petitioner can be granted bail at this stage on the basis of the available materials. 5. Accordingly, in the given facts and circumstances, the accused petitioner herein is allowed to go on bail of Rs. 30,000/- with one surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sribhumi Karimganj and subject to the following conditions that:- (i) That the accused person shall be available for the trial, (ii) That the accused shall not hamper or tamper with evidence. (iii) That the accused person shall not in any manner intimidate harass or harm the informant, witnesses and their family members. 6. In case of violation of any bail conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move a suitable application for cancellation of the bail application of the petitioner. Page No.# 3/3 7. This bail application stands allowed and disposed of. 8. Send back the case diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant