PANKAJ ROHILLA AND ORS. v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
W.P.(C)/13341/2019 · 2025-07-30
Madhu Jain, Navin Chawla
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25232 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25232 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
$~46 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 356/2020
SAJAN
.....Petitioner
Through: Mr.Sachin Miglani and
Ms.Sukriti Ghai, Advs.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
.....Respondents
Through: Mr.Piyush Beriwal, Ms.Jyotsna
Vyas, Ms.Ruchita Srivastava,
Advs. for R-1 to 3.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAIN
O R D E R %
06.08.2025 CM APPL. 48056/2025
1. By this application, the learned counsel for the respondent nos.1 to 3 states that his appearance has not been recorded in the Judgment dated
30.07.2025.
2. Having heard the learned counsel for the respondent nos.1 to 3/applicants, the application is allowed.
3. The appearance of Mr.Piyush Beriwal, Advocate, shall be duly reflected for the respondent nos.1 to 3 in the Judgment dated 30.07.2025.
4. The application is disposed of.
By:REYMON VASHIST Signing Date:14.08.2025 14:51:40
5. This order shall be uploaded as a Corrigendum to the Judgment dated 30.07.2025.
NAVIN CHAWLA, J
MADHU JAIN, J AUGUST 6, 2025/Arya/DG
By:REYMON VASHIST Signing Date:14.08.2025 14:51:40