Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25231 (KAR)

M T KRISHNAPPA v. BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

WP/18854/2018 · 2025-06-25

S G Pandit, T M Nadaf

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22884-DB WP No. 18854 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF WRIT PETITION NO.18854 OF 2018 (BDA) BETWEEN: M T KRISHNAPPA S/O LATE M.THIMMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS R/AT NO.1, HEALTH LAYOUT, SRIGANDADAKAVAL, BENGALURU – 560 091. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. A CHANDRACHUD, ADVOCATE) AND: BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SANKEY ROAD, 5TH MAIN, KUMARA PARK WEST, GUTTAHALLI, BENGALURU – 560 020. REPT. BY ITS COMMISSIONER …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. G.LAKSHMEESH RAO, ADVOCATE) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO a) ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT OR DIRECTION, QUASHING THE ENQUIRY COMMITTEE REPORT, PASSED IN ENQUIRY NO.6/2015, VIDE ANNEXURE-G; b) ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT OR DIRECTION TO RESPONDENT TO EXECUTE A REGISTERED SALE DEED IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER HEREIN, ETC Digitally signed by MADHUSHREE H Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22884-DB WP No. 18854 of 2018 THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT) Sri.A.Chandrachud, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri.G.Lakshmeesh Rao, learned counsel for the respondent - BDA is present. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that memo dated 05.06.2025 is filed to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file better and comprehensive writ petition. 3. Sri.G.Lakshmeesh Rao, learned counsel opposes the liberty sought, but he has no objection to the prayer for withdrawal of the writ petition. 4. Memo insofar as withdrawal is accepted. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22884-DB WP No. 18854 of 2018 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 6. No reasons are stated for reserving liberty to file better and comprehensive writ petition. In the absence of reasons, we are not inclined to grant any liberty. Sd/- (S.G.PANDIT) JUDGE Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE MH/- List No.: 1 Sl No.: 34