Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25229 (ALL)

PYARELAL SONKAR v. STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

NA529/395/2025 · 2025-03-04

Nalin Kumar Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:31333 Court No. - 82 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 395 of 2025 Applicant :- Pyarelal Sonkar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Kaushlendra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. This application under Section 529 BNSS has been filed with a prayer to direct the court concerned to expedite the trial of the Complaint Case No. 1453 of 2020, under Sections 406, 504 IPC and 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station Line Bazar, District Jaunpur pending in the Court of Additional Civil Judge (J.D.) New Court IIth Jaunpur expeditiously within stipulated period. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that present case is a private complaint case wherein accused persons have appeared, however, an application for discharge under Section 245 (2) Cr.P.C. was moved by them on 21.7.2023 and the same is still pending. 4. Learned AGA opposed the prayer. 5. I have considered the submissions and perused the record. 6. In the circumstances, the Court concerned is directed to dispose of the aforesaid discharge application in accordance with law within two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order before it, if there is no legal impediment. 7. The Court concerned is further directed that if charges are framed against the accused persons all endevours shall be made by the trial Court to decide the aforesaid case in accordance with law within one and half year from the date of production of certified copy of this order before it, if there is no legal impediment. It is further directed that no unnecessary adjournment will be sought/granted. 8. It is also made clear that the Court / Presiding Officer is not the only stake holder in the trial and disposal of a case, hence, besides the P.O. concerned, all the stake holders i.e. police and executive authorities, counsels, parties to the case, staff etc. are also made bound by this order and it will be their responsibility also to assist the Court in every manner for the expeditious disposal of this case. 9. With the above observations, the application stands disposed of. Order Date :- 5.3.2025 Fhd Digitally signed by :- FAHAD NIYAZ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad