Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25224 (GAU)

SRUTI RAJ NATH v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS

WP(C)/3070/2023 · 2025-11-16

Kardak Ete

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010115852023 2025:GAU-AS:15501 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3070/2023 SRUTI RAJ NATH S/O- LATE CHITTARANJAN NATH, R/O- HOJAI TOWN, WARD NO. 1, P.O. AND P.S.- HOJAI, DIST.- NAGAON, ASSAM, PIN- 782435. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, EDUCATION ELEMENTARY DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06. 2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM EDUCATION SECONDARY DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-06. 3:THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI- 19. 4:THE DIRECTOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI- 19. 5:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF Page No.# 2/3 ASSAM FINANCE DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-06. 6:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM PENSION AND PUBLIC GRIEVANCES DEPTT. DISPUR GUWAHATI-06. 7:THE PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A AND E) ASSAM MAIDAMGAON BELTOLA GUWAHATI-29 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR H TALUKDAR, MRS. M DEKA Advocate for the Respondent : SC, ELEM. EDU, SC, AG,SC, FINANCE,SC, SEC. EDU. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 17-11-2025 None appears for the petitioner on call. Ms. P. Das, learned Standing Counsel, Secondary Education Department, by placing the communication dated 09.10.2025 from the Secretary to the Government of Assam, Department of School Education, submits that as regards the petitioner’s claim in the present writ petition, the petitioner was heard and asked to furnish certain documents relating to her father to enable the Department to proceed further, which the petitioner have agreed to. However, the petitioner is yet to furnish the relevant documents as required and as agreed to by the petitioner. Considering above, it appears that the petitioner is no longer interested to pursue this writ petition. Accordingly, writ petition stands dismissed for non- Page No.# 3/3 prosecution. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to submit the relevant documents before the respondent authorities, as required and as agreed to by the petitioner, for consideration by the respondent authorities in accordance with law. Mr. D. Baruah, learned Standing Counsel, AG for respondent No. 4, is present. JUDGE Comparing Assistant