APHC010355922018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) ANDHRA PRADESH % TUESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JULyH® TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT FIVE the honourable dr justice VmiT petition Mr>.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 16605 OF ?ni« Between: Smt. Manda China Kumari, Sy.No.593/4 A2, Damini District. W/o Bhushanam, Aged about Colony, Atmakur Village 32 years, R/o Durgi Mandal, Guntur ...Petitioner AND 1- The State of A P 2. The Superintendent of Police 3. The Tahsildar M R o. Guntur District Rural, Guntur. Durgi Mandal, Guntur District. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Cohstitution of India praying that in the in the affidavit filed therewith, an appropriate order or direction Circumstances stated i pleased to issue the High Court may be especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of against the 3rd the 2nd respondent in not respondent basing on the petitioners which is illegal, improper, arbitrary and and 21 of Constitution of India. taking action representation dated 02-03-2018 violation of Article 14 Consequently direct the reoreTTr'" ^«^P°ndent basing representation dated 02-03-2018 2nd respondent to take on the petitioner's so as to protect us from 7 "K the constant threats and high handedness law and thereby of the 3rd respondent against the jANO: 1 dF2nifi Petition under Section 151 CPC ih the affidavit filed i direct the 2nd praying that in the circumstances stated in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased appropriate action against the 3rd respondent to take respondent basing on the petitioner to protect us from the I respondent against the law, pending disposal s representation dated 02-03-2018 constant threats and high handedness so as of the 3rd of above Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI MASTHAN NAIDU CHERUKURI Counsel for the Respondents No.1, 2: GP FOR HOME (AP) Counsel for the Respondent No. The Court made the following order: 3: GP FOR REVENUE (AP) APHC010355922018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 16605/2018 [3396] Between: SMT. MANDA CHINA KUMARI, W/0 BHUSHANAM, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/0 SY.NO.593/4 A2, DAMINI COLONY, ATMAKUR VILLAGE, DURGI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF A P REP BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT. SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR DISTRICT RURAL, GUNTUR. 3.THE TAHSILDAR M R O, DURGI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RE.SPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.MASTHAN NAIDU CHERUKURI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME (AP) 2.GP FOR REVENUE (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for; “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondent in not taking action against the 3^^ respondent basing on the petitioners representation dated 02-03-2018 which is illegal, improper, arbitrary and violation of Article 14 and 21 of Constitution of India. Consequently direct the 2"^ respondent to take appropriate action against the 3 respondent basing on the petitioner's representation dated 02- rd 2 0 03-2018 so as to protect us from the constant threats and high handedness of the 3^^ respondent against the law.” Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home written instructions, would submit that, after disposal of W.P.No.26759 of 2017 filed by the Petitioner, the Police will take action on the representation of the Petitioner. 3. Sri Masthan Naidu Cherukuri, learned counsel for the Petitioner submit that the Court may pass appropriate orders. 4. For ready reference, the written instructions filed by learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, are extracted hereunder; “It is submitted that after disposal of the .WP.No. 26759/2017 filed by the petitioner, taken by the Sub Inspector of Police, Durgi Police Station the representation of the petitioner dated 2.3.2018. allegations against the 3'^ respondent Tahsildar, Durgi Mandal, Guntur District is incorrect and baseless, after completing the enquiry on the representation of the petitioner dated 2.3.2018, the Sub Inspector of Police, Durgi Police Station will submit a report to the Superintendent of Police, Guntur District.” 2. on would necessary action will be on The However, 5. Admittedly, W,P.No.26759 of 2017 filed by the Petitioner alleging that the Respondent No.3 herein tried to evict the Petitioner from his land same is pending adjudication before this Court, herein submitted a representation dated 02.03.2018 to take against Respondent No.3 and also seeking protection. and the Meanwhile, the Petitioner appropriate action 3 6. Considering the submissions made and in view of the written instructions submitted by the learned Assistant Government Pleader, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand Sd/- U. SRIDEVI assistant registrar closed. //TRUE COPY// AT" SEQTION OFFICER of Andhra Pradesh, Home Department. To, 1. The Principal Secretary, State Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur District. Superintendent of Police, Guntur District Rural, Guntur. 3. The Tahsildar M R O, Durgi Mandal, Guntur District. MASTHAN NAIDU CHERUKUR! Advocate [OPUC] FOR HOME (AP) High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] REVENUE (AP) High Court of Andhra Pradesh 2. The 4. One CC to SRI 5. Two CCs to GP 6. Two CCs to GP FOR [OUT] 7. Two CD Copies gsg HIGH COURT DATED: 15/07/2025 ORDER WP NO. 16605 OF 2018 DISPOSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS