SRI YOGARAJ L v. THE KARNATAKA POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LIMITED (KPTCL)
WP/15535/2025 · 2025-06-05
H T Narendra Prasad
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25222 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 25222 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18949 WP No. 15535 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 15535 OF 2025 (S-RES) BETWEEN:
SRI YOGARAJ L S/O LATE LINGAIAH AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS OCC- ASSISTANT ENGINEER (ELECTRICAL) (UNDER SUSPENSION) PIN- 17487 OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE UNIT BASAVANAGAR, SOUTH-17 SUBDIVISION BANGALORE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED (BESCOM) BENGALURU- 560037.
R/AT- NO. 12/A, SAGARA, 2ND FLOOR 3RD MAIN ROAD, BANASHANKARI IV STAGE BDA LAYOUT, BIKASIPURA BENGALURU SOUTH BENGALURU CITY- 560 078. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. HARIPRASAD M.B., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE KARNATAKA POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LIMITED (KPTCL) REP BY ITS DIRECTOR ADMINISTRATION AND HUMAN RESOURCES CAUVERY BHAVAN BENGALURU- 560009.
2.
THE BANGALORE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED (BESCOM) REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR CORPORATE OFFICE K.R. CIRCLE, BENGALURU- 560 001.
Digitally signed by HEMALATHA A Location: HIGH COURTOF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:18949 WP No. 15535 of 2025
3.
THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE KARNATAKA LOKAYUKTHA M.S.BUILDING DR.B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD BENGALURU- 560 001. …RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ALLOW THE PRESENT WRIT PETITION AND QUASH THE SUSPENSION
ORDER DATED: 14.02.2025 PASSED IN
ORDER NO.
KPTCL/B82/57671/2024-25 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD ORAL ORDER
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo stating that in view of subsequent event, this writ petition has become infructuous.
2. Memo is taken on record.
3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE
HA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7