IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 15095 of 2024 Decided on: 04.01.2025 Virender Singh Parmar …….Petitioner Versus Himachal Road Transport Corporation and another … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Rahul Gathania, Advocate. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Rahul Gathania, learned Counsel, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. When this case was taken up for consideration today, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that it would be in the interest of justice, in case, the petitioner is allowed to file a representation to the Authority concerned with regard to the issue raised in the writ petition and said representation is directed to be decided within some reasonable time. Accordingly, as prayed for, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction that in the event of the petitioner filing a representation with regard to the issue raised in the writ petition to the competent Authority within a period of three weeks from today, let the same be decided, in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks thereafter, in view of the 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 averments made therein as well as judgments, if any, being relied upon by the petitioner, by passing a speaking order. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge January 04, 2025 (narender)