Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25217 (GAU)

RAMEN DAKUA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

Bail Appln./3462/2025 · 2025-11-09

Sanjeev Kumar Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010233972025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./3462/2025 RAMEN DAKUA S/O- LT CHABIN CH DAKUA R/O- GITAMANDIR, GOPAL KRISHNA PATH, H/NO- 30, NOONMATI,ASSAM P.O. P.S- NOONMATI PIN-781020, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY SPECIAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, GOVT OF ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. B K MAHAJAN, Z HAQUE,MR G BARGAYARY,MR P P MEDHI Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER Date : 10.11.2025 1. Heard Mr. B. K. Mahajan, learned counsel appearing for the accused petitioner as well as Mr. D. P. Goswami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam. 2. By this petition under Section 483 BNSS, the accused-petitioner, namely, Ramen Dakua who was arrested on 04.10.2025 in connection with Chandmari PS Case No. 239/2025 under Section 103(2) of BNSS is seeking bail. 3. The gist of the allegation is that on 02.10.2025 when the informant’s brother Page No.# 2/2 was returning after immersion of the Durga Idol, he was badly attacked by 30- 40 persons and brought to KGMT Hospital where he succumbed to his injuries. 4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the present petitioner is not a participant of the assault. 5. Mr. D. P. Goswami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that the postmortem report reveals multiple injuries on the person of the deceased. However, he submits that there is no incriminating material against the present petitioner. 6. In view of the above as well as the period of detention of 34 days already undergone by the accused petitioner, prayer for bail is allowed. 7. Accordingly, it is provided that the accused petitioner, named above, shall be released on bail of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Kamrup(M), Guwahati subject to the following condition:- (i) That the accused petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court. 8. Return the case diary. 9. The bail application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant