APHC010355782025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JULY , TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WP(PIL) NO: 121 OF 2025 Between: Chirugudi Adam Kumar, S/o. C. Kondala Prathap Rao, Aged about 47 years, Occ Advocate, R/o.1-214-f-1, AMB compound, Markapur, District, Andhra Pradesh. Aadhar 412187421068, SBI A/c 860510100011019, PAN Number.AKUPC9709L Prakasham ...Petitioner AND .1. The Hon’ble High Court of AP, represented by Registrar General, Nelapadu, Amaravathi. <2. State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its principal Secretary, Law and Legislative Affairs, Secretariat, Andhra Pradesh 8. The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its principal Secretary Home, Secretariat, Andhra Pradesh ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature c of Writ of Mandamus, (a) Directing the 1st respondent to issue guidelines to the district judiciary under Article 235 of the Indian Constitution to strictly comply with the Rule 27 of The Criminal Rules of Practice and Circular Orders, 1990 and thereby mandate all the trail courts to forward remand orders along with reasons to the Sessions Judge within 24 hours from the time of passing them and to provide the certified copies of the remand orders within 24 hours, (b) Directing the 1st respondent to issue guidelines to the district judiciary to act upon the private complaints filed before them under Section 223 BNSS (Section 200 CRPC) and forthwith and pass appropriate orders as stipulated under Section 223 BNSS (Section 200 CRPC) bound manner without causing any delay, (c) Directing the respondents herein to take such stringent actions including initiation of proceedings the Contempt of Court Act, 1971 against the police officers who arrested the accused in violation of the law declared by the Honorable Supreme Court in Arnesh Kumar judgment and as reiterated by this Honorable court in the judgement of Bollineni Rajagopal Naidu vs State of A.P. reported in 2022(3) ALT 407 in addition to such other departmental proceedings. lA NO: 1 OF 2Q2fi in a time- 1 to 3 under Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to a) direct the 1st respondent to issue guidelines to the district judiciary under Article 235 of the Indian Constitution to strictly comply with the Rule 27 of The Criminal Rules of Practice and Circular Orders, 1990 and thereby mandate all the trial courts to forward remand orders along with reasons to the Sessions Judge within 24 hours from the time of passing them and to provide the copies of the remand orders within 24 hours, b) Direct the 1ST respondent to issue guidelines to the district judiciary to act upon the private complaints filed before them under Section 223 BNSS (Section 200 CRPC) and forthwith and pass appropriate orders as stipulated under Section 223 BNSS (Section 200 CRPC) in a time-bound manner without certified causing any delay, c) Direct the respondents 1 to 3 herein to take such stringent action including initiating of proceedings under the Contempt of Court Act, 1971 against the police officers who arrested the accused in violation of the law declared by the Honorable Supreme Court in Arnesh Kumar judgment and as reiterated by this Honorable Court in the judgement of Bollineni Rajagopal Naidu vs State of A.P. reported in 2022(3) ALT 407 in addition to such other departmental proceedings. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI L RAVICHANDER, SENIOR COUNSEL REPRESENTING SRI HARISH KUMAR RASINENI Counsel for the Respondent No.3: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.1 Counsel for the Respondent No.2: GP FOR LAW LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS The Court made the following order: APHC010355782025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI Bench Sr.No:-8 [3483] WP{PIL) NO: 121 of 2025 Chirugudi Adam Kumar ...Petitioner Vs. The Hon’ble High Court of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...Respondents ********** Advocate for Petitioner Mr. L. Ravichander, Senior Counsel along with Mr. Harish Kumar Rasineni (AoR) Advocate(s) for Respondent{s); CORAM :THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI DATE : 16th July 2025 P C : The issues raised in the present petition can more appropriately be dealt with on the administrative side. Be that as it may, we do not deem it absolutely necessary to entertain the present WP(PIL) which is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- A. VIJAYA BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1. The Registrar General, Amaravathi. 2. The Principal Secretary, Andhra Pradesh Hon’ble High Court of AP, Nelapadu, Law and Legislative Affairs, Secretariat, "v 3. The Principal Secretary, Home, Secretariat, Andhra Pradesh 4. One CC to Sri Harish Kumar Rasineni Advocate [OPUC] '5. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 6. Two CCs to GP for Law & Legislative Affairs, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 7. Two CD Copies TF HIGH COURT DATED:16/07/2025 ORDER WP(PIL) NO. 121 OF 2025 OV := 23 jut 2IW5 v% Current Secuon DISPOSING OF THE W.P.(PIL), WITHOUT COSTS