Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25213 (PNJ)

GOVIND v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/8363/2025 · 2025-08-28

Kirti Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-8363-2025 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 203 CRM-M-8363-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 28.08.2025 GOVIND ...Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA ...Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE KIRTI SINGH Present:- Mr. Sunil Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anmol Malik, DAG, Haryana. ***** KIRTI SINGH , J. (Oral) 1. Apprehending his arrest the petitioner has filed this petition under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of anticipatory bail in case bearing FIR No.02 dated 03.01.2025 under Sections 115, 3(5), 351(3), 64(1), 79 and 89 of BNS, registered at Police Station Women Police Station NIT, Faridabad, District Faridabad. 2. Learned State counsel on instructions, while placing reliance on the reply dated 26.05.2025 submits that as per paragraph 15 thereof, in compliance of order dated 19.05.2025, the petitioner joined the investigation on 22.05.2025 and also got recovered the mobile phone, which was used in the commission of offence and is not required for any further investigation. 3. Accordingly, the instant petition is allowed. The petitioner is directed to join the investigation within a week. In the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail by the arresting/ investigating officer on his furnishing bail/ surety bonds to the satisfaction of the arresting/ investigating officer, subject to the conditions as provided under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. It is also directed that in case in future the petitioner is required to join the investigation process, thereupon he shall join the investigation and cooperate fully with the investigation process. ITHLESH KUMAR 2025.08.29 16:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment CRM-M-8363-2025 (O&M) 2 4. It is made clear that this order should not be treated as "blanket" order. It will not be read granting the petitioner indefinite protection from arrest. It shall be confined to the FIR mentioned ibid and will not operate in respect of any other incident that involves commission of an offence. 5. This order does not in any manner limit or restrict the rights or duties of the police or investigating agency to investigate into the charges against the petitioner. 6. The accused-petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him or her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer. 7. The accused-petitioner shall not leave India without prior permission of the Court. 8. The accused-petitioner shall join the investigation as and when called by the police. 9. It will be open to the police or the investigating agency to move to this Court for a direction under Section 483(3) of BNSS, 2023 (erstwhile Section 439(2) of Cr.P.C.) to arrest the accused-petitioner, in the event of violation of any term, such as absconding, non-cooperating during investigation, evasion, intimidation or inducement to witnesses with a view to influence outcome of the investigation or trial. 10. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (KIRTI SINGH) 28.08.2025 JUDGE Ithlesh Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No ITHLESH KUMAR 2025.08.29 16:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment