VIJAY NARAYAN UNIYAL v. GARHWAL MANDAL VIKAS NIGAM
WPSB/335/2017 · 2025-03-11
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, Pankaj Purohit
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2521 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2521 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures
WPSB 335/2017 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.
Mr. Yash Bisht, Advocate, i/b Mr. Vikas Bahuguna, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Ruchika Negi, Advocate, i/b Mr. Sandeep Kothari, Advocate for the respondent no. 1. Mr. M.C. Pant, Advocate, for the respondent no. 2.
(2) Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner makes a statement at the bar that writ petition has become infructuous inasmuch as petitioner has retired from service. This statement is not disputed by learned Counsel for the respondents. (3) Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(Pankaj Purohit, J.) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.)
11.3.2025 Pr