Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2521 (UTT)

VIJAY NARAYAN UNIYAL v. GARHWAL MANDAL VIKAS NIGAM

WPSB/335/2017 · 2025-03-11

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures WPSB 335/2017 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Yash Bisht, Advocate, i/b Mr. Vikas Bahuguna, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Ruchika Negi, Advocate, i/b Mr. Sandeep Kothari, Advocate for the respondent no. 1. Mr. M.C. Pant, Advocate, for the respondent no. 2. (2) Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner makes a statement at the bar that writ petition has become infructuous inasmuch as petitioner has retired from service. This statement is not disputed by learned Counsel for the respondents. (3) Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 11.3.2025 Pr