SUBODH DAGAR AND ANOTHER v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS
CRMMO/1241/2025 · 2026-04-21
Sandeep Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2521 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2521 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CrMMO No. 1241 of 2025
Date of Decision: 21.4.2026 _____________________________________________________________________ Sh. Subodh Dagar and Anr. ……...Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors.
…....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?
For the Petitioners: Mr. Anshul Attri, Advocate, vice Mr. Arvind Negi, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General and Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General, for the State.
Ms. Preeti, Advocate, vice Mr. Jeevesh Sharma, Advocate for respondents No.4 & 5. ___________________________________________________________________________
Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file appropriate application under Section 72 of the CrPC for cancellation of NBWs.
2.
Ordered accordingly.
3.
Needless to say, court below in the event of filing application, if any, under Section 72 of the CrPC, would take into consideration documents, if any, adduced on record by the petitioner No.1 with regard to
2 his illness and if required, factum with regard to his illness can be verified by directing him to appear in the court through Video Conferencing.
April 21, 2026
(Sandeep Sharma), (manjit)
Judge