APHC010355852025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 18216/2025 Between: 1. DANIMIREDDI LAKSHMI, W/O RAJA BABU, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/O YB-PATNAM VILLAGE NATHAVARAM MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, NARSIPATNAM DIVISION, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, NATHAVARAM MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or directions more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in interfering with the construction activity undertaken by the petitioner in Sy.No.71/1 to an extent of Ac.1.1/2 cents, Y.B-Patnam Village, Nathavaram Mandal, Anakapalli District, pursuant to the house site certificate issued by the 3rd respondent in terms of G.O.Ms.No.546 Revenue (Asn.l) Department, dated 20.06.1997, without any notice, without any proceedings is highly illegal, arbitrary. unconstitutional, and in violation of Articles 14and 21 of the Constitution of India and consuently direct the 3rd respondent not to interfere with the construction activity of the petitioners in open site situated in Sy.No 71/1 to an extent of Ac.1.1/2 cents, .B-Patnam Village, Nathavaram Mandal, Anakapalli District and to Pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent not to interfere with the construction activity of the petitioner’s in open site situated in Sy.No.71/1 to an extent of Ac.1 1/2 cents, Y.B-Patnam Village, Nathavaram Mandal, Anakapalli District pending disposal of the writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V V N NARAYANA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER Heard Sri B.Uzwal, learned counsel representing Sri V.V.N.Narayana Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri G.Divya Theja, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for the respondents. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the 3rd respondent is interfering with the construction activity of the petitioner in an extent of Ac.0.01½ cents situated in S.No.71/1 of Y.B.Patnam village, Nathavaram Mandal, Anakapalli District, without issuing any notice. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner was assigned an extent of Ac.0.01½ cents of house site by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Nathavaram, under Ex.P2 patta. He would submit that when the petitioner is making construction, the 3rd respondent visited the site on 24.06.2025 and orally directed to stop the construction. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, on instructions, would submit that on receipt of an oral complaint from third parties, an enquiry was conducted. The 3rd respondent is not interfering with the petitioner’s construction activity. The said submission is placed on record. 5. Given the facts and circumstances of the case, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the admission stage with the consent of learned counsel on either side, directing the 3rd respondent not to interfere with the construction activity of the petitioner in respect of Ac.0.01½ cents situated in S.No.71/1 of Y.B.Patnam village, Nathavaram Mandal, Anakapalli District, without following due process of law. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI PVD