[2025:RJ-JP:30624] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9323/2025 Rajeev @ Raju S/o Shri Ramchandra, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Jawahar Colony, Police Station Mahwa, District Dausa (Raj.) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Bandikui, District Dausa). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bheem Sain Bairwa For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 08/08/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.460/2023 registered at Police Station New Mandi Hindaun, District Karauli for the offence punishable under Sections 417, 418, 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120B of IPC. 2. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner contends that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is submitted that co-accused person namely- Mohan Lal has entered into compromise with the complainant and on that basis he has been granted benefit of bail by the co-ordinate bench of this court. It is contended that trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Counsel contends that petitioner is in custody since [2025:RJ-JP:30624] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-9323/2025] his date of arrest and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner and submits that petitioner is a habitual offender as three other cases have been registered against him. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, as also considering the fact that co- accused person of this case has already been granted benefit of bail and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner – Rajeev @ Raju S/o Shri Ramchandra shall be released on bail provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence in first week of every month in the concerned [2025:RJ-JP:30624] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-9323/2025] police station, till trial is concluded. 8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner, as directed above. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 9. If breach of any of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court. 10. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned SHO for necessary compliance. 11. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN /290