Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25197 (GAU)

THANURAM KONWAR AND 9 ORS v. ON THE DEATH OF SRI KAMAL CHANDRA PATOR, PRESIDENT, DAHALI MAKARIA BHOGDOBHA HABI GRAM SABHA HIS L

RSA/150/2012 · 2025-11-05

Parthivjyoti Saikia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010007602012 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : RSA/150/2012 THANURAM KONWAR AND 9 ORS S/O LATE DHIRSING KONWAR 2: PUTU KONWAR S/O GOPAL KONWAR 3: PADMESWAR KONWAR S/SO LATE DHENURAM KONWAR 4: HAHIRAM KONWAR S/O SRI SAMBAR KONWAR 5: RAJEN BORDOLOI S/O UNKNOWN 6: BISHNU BORDOLOI S/O KEPRAM BORDOLOI NOS. 1 TO 7 ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF VILL. DAHALI MOUZA-UTTARKHOLA DIST. MORIGAON ASSAM PIN-782413 7: SUN KUMAR MEDHI S/O SRI DEBA KUMAR MEDHI 8: HARENDRA KUMAR BORA Page No.# 2/3 S/O LATE SIBA BORA 9: JUGESWAR DEKA S/O HOLIRAM DEKA 10: JUGEN PATOR S/O LATE SADOR PATOR NOS. 8 TO 11 ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF VILL. MAKARIA MOUZA-UTARKHOLA DIST. MORIGAON ASSAM PIN-78241 VERSUS ON THE DEATH OF SRI KAMAL CHANDRA PATOR, PRESIDENT, DAHALI MAKARIA BHOGDOBHA HABI GRAM SABHA HIS L PRESIDENT, DAHALI MAKARIA BHOGDOBHA HABI GRAM SABHA, MOUZA-UTTARKHOLA, DIST. MORIGAON, ASSAM, PIN-782413 2:HEMA MADAR S/O LATE REKEN MADAR SECY. DAHALI MAKARIA BHOGDOBHA HABI SABHA MOUZA-UTTARKHOLA DIST.MORIGAON ASSAM PIN-78241 Advocate for the Petitioner : MRK K DAS, MR.A DHAR Advocate for the Respondent : MR.M U MONDAL, MR.H R AHMED,MR.M HUSSAIN,MR.J ISLAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER Date : 06.11.2025 1. Heard Mr. A Dhar, learned counsel for the appellant. Also heard Mr. M.U Mondol, Page No.# 3/3 learned counsel appearing for the respondents. 2. Mr. A Dhar, learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that out of 11(eleven) appellants, 6(six) have already expired and the remaining appellants do not want to proceed further with this appeal. According to Mr. A Dhar, both the respondents have also expired. 3. After considering the submissions made by learned counsel of both sides, this Court is of the opinion that the appeal has been abetted and accordingly disposed of. 4. The T.C.R which has been received shall be returned back. JUDGE Comparing Assistant