Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25196 (RAJ)

KRISHAN SINGH @ MANMOHAN SINGH S/O HUKAMSINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/9350/2025 · 2025-08-08

Anil Kumar Upman

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:30815] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9350/2025 Krishan Singh @ Manmohan Singh S/o Hukamsingh, R/o Aalampur, Police Station Basdayal, District Kotputli-Behror. (Presently Confined In Sub Jail, Kotputli, District Kotputli- Behror). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.K. Mathur, Sr. Adv., assisted by Mr. Aayush Goyal, Adv., and Mr. Lucky Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP with Mr. Tapesh Agarwal, PP and Mr. Vikas Saini, Adv., for complainant. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 08/08/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.210/2025 registered at Police Station Paniyala, District Kotputli-Behror for the offences punishable under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2) and 109(1) of BNS, 2023. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He submits that all the injuries sustained to injured are simple in nature. He argues that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner and trial of the case will take considerable time in its conclusion. He contends that the petitioner is in custody since 09.07.2025 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. [2025:RJ-JP:30815] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-9350/2025] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor assisted by learned counsel for the complainant vehemently opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, especially the fact that all the injuries sustained to injured are simple in nature, absence of criminal antecedents and trial will take time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner- Krishan Singh @ Manmohan Singh S/o Hukamsingh shall be released on bail provided, he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/S-430