Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25196 (JHR)

ANUJ YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./5504/2025 · 2025-09-18

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 A.B.A. No. 5504 of 2025 2025:JHHC:28677 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI ---- A.B.A. No. 5504 of 2025 ---- 1.Anuj Yadav son of Jagdan Mahto aged about 60 years 2.Chhatru Yadav son of late Nandu Yadav aged about 43 years 3.Birendra Yadav son of late Bishun Yadav, aged about 43 years 4.Rajesh Yadav son of Sidheshwar Yadav, aged about 33 years 5.Ramchandra Yadav son of Jhuri Mahto aged about 62 years 6.Sidheshwar Yadav son of Jhuri Mahto aged about 51 years All resident of Village Pedirma PO and PS Barhi District Hazaribagh .... Petitioners -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioners :- Mr. Himanshu Harsh, Advocate For the State :- Ms Mahua Palit, Advocate ---- 2/18.09.2025 Heard learned counsels for petitioners and for State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Barhi P.S. Case No.384 of 2024, for offence registered under section 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 303(2), 352, 3(5), 61(2) of BNS, 2023, pending in court of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Hazaribagh. 3. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that there are case and counter case between the parties and on the same day both the parties lodged the FIR and injury is simple in nature which has come in the impugned order. He further submits that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph no.12 of the petition. 4. Learned State counsel opposes prayer and submits that injury has been received and in view of that anticipatory bail may kindly be rejected. 5. Considering that there are case and counter case between the parties and on the same day both the FIRs have been lodged and it has come in the 2 A.B.A. No. 5504 of 2025 order of the learned Sessions Judge that injury is simple in nature and the petitioners have got no criminal antecedents as aforesaid, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to petitioners. 6. Accordingly, petitioners, above named, are hereby directed to surrender before learned court within three weeks from today, and in event of their surrender/arrest, petitioners, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand), with two sureties of like amount each, to satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Hazaribagh, in connection with Barhi P.S. Case No.384 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 482(2) of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023. ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated: 18th Sept., 2025 SI/