Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 25196 (CHH)

MIRZA HABEEB BAIG v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

MCC/604/2019 · 2025-01-09

Shri Sanjay K Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 (MCC No. 604 of 2019) 2025:CGHC:1514 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 604 of 2019 1 - Mirza Habeeb Baig S/o Shri M.H.A. Baig Aged About 40 Years R/o Tulsipur, Bakhtawar Chal, Ward No. 18, Police Station Kotwali, Rajnandgaon, Tahsil Rajnandgaon Civil And Revenue District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh --- Applicant(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Home, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Capital Bhawan, New Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Superintendent Of Police Rajnandgaon, Civil And Revenue District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 3 - Shashi Mohan Additional Superintendent Of Police Rajnandgaon, Civil And Revenue District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 4 - Tul Singh Station House Police Station Dongargaon, Civil And Revenue District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 5 - Bhola Sinh Sub Inspector District Crime Branch, Rajnandgaon, Civil And Revenue District- Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 6 - Inspector General Of Police Range Durg, Civil And Revenue District- Durg, Chhattisgarh 7 - Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter Raipur, Civil And Revenue District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh --- Non-applicant(s) (Cause-title taken from the Case Information System) ADITI DIWAN KAIWART Digitally signed by ADITI DIWAN KAIWART 2 (MCC No. 604 of 2019) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Applicant :-Mr. Kulesh Sahu, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Mirza Hafeez Baig, Advocate For Non-applicant Nos.1,2,6 & 7/State :-Mr. Rahul Tamaskar, Govt. Adv. For Non-applicant Nos.3,4 & 5 :-None. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 09.01.2025 1. Heard. 2. This MCC has been filed seeking restoration of WPCR No.272/2016, which was dismissed for want of prosecution by order of this Court dated 19.06.2019. 3. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. WPCR No.272/2016 is restored to its original number for its hearing and disposal in accordance with law. 4. Accordingly, this MCC is allowed. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge @d!t!