1 2025:CGHC:23316-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2796 of 2025 1 - Tayaltech Through It Proprietor Ajay Agrawal Aged About 45 Years S/o Shri Ghanshyam Das Agrawal R/o 2nd Floor, Tayal Technology Hub Near Deendayal Park Vyapar Vihar Bilaspur Police Station Tarbahar, Tahsil Civil And Revenue District - Bilaspur (C.G.) Mo. No. 7697693000 ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Divisional Railway Manager Drm Office, North Eastern Railway 10 Ashok Marg Lucknow (U.P.) - 226001 2 - Senior Divisional Material Manager Drm Office, North Eastern Railway 10 Ashok Marg Lucknow (U.P.) -226001 3 - Senior Divisional Electrical Engineer (Operation) Drm Office, North Eastern Railway 10 Ashok Marg Lucknow (U.P.) -226001 4 - Senior Divisional Finance Manager Drm Office, North Eastern Railway 10 Ashok Marg Lucknow (U.P.) -226001 5 - Dharmendra Kumar Yadav Senior Divisional Electrical Engineer (Operation Drm Office, North Eastern Railway Lohartara, Banaras (U.P.) - 226002 ... Respondents Cause title has been taken from CIS For Petitioner : Mr. Ratnesh Kumar Agrawal, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Mr. Shashank Thakur, Dy.A.G. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Digitally signed by AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Date: 2025.06.13 15:02:04 +0530 2 12.06.2025 1. In the present petition, the petitioner has prayed for following relief:- “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for entire records of the case, from the respondent authorities. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be please to direct the respondent authorities to make payment to the petitioner firm tune of Rs. 319120/- with 24% interest per annum from 01.10.2024 to its realization, is in the interest of justice. 10.3 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be please to direct the respondent authorities to takes appropriate action against the respondent no. 5 for working malafide intention with petitioner, is in the interest of justice. 10.4 That, any other relief/order which may deem fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case including award of the costs of the petition may be given.” 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the respondents submits that the present writ petition is against the North Eastern Railway, Lucknow (Uttar Pradesh. The cause of action arose in Lucknow (Uttar Pradesh), as such, this writ petition is not maintainable. 3. In view of the above submission, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to approach before the appropriate forum. 4. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. SD/- SD/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Rahul/Amardeep